The article about Eminem in The New Yorker basically made me want to rip my hair out. The journalist blatantly bashes Eminem as being an overrated artist that continually attacks the same two people (his mother and ex-wife Kim) in his music. His rhymes are deemed to be "perfectly pitched" and listening to his songs makes people feel like they are "...being hit in the arm by someone's little brother 45 times in a row." Harsh much? The only semi-postive comment the journalist says about Eminem has to do with his song "Mosh," where the artist shares his political views on Bush sending U.S. troops to war in Iraq. Immediately after complimenting Eminem on the song, the journalist turns right around and says that such a topic is clever but "not Eminem's style." I disagree with a majority of the claims made in this article but plan to use them to support my thesis :)
Both articles mention something about Eminem being "rebellious" and "breaking the rules." I used this idea to form my thesis:
By poking fun at the stereotypical "white society" he is expected to adhere to, Eminem expresses confidence in his rebellious nature that inherently breaks the rigid rules of white culture.
It is impossible to fit someone like Eminem into a four sided box (as my title relays). In my essay, I plan to argue that Eminem shows confidence in his ability to break the rules of stereotypical "white America" by making fun of the structured culture.
I love this post about Eminem. I can relate completely to what you are saying because my artist is somewhat similar.. Being a white artist from the Midwest, Machine Gun Kelly also has had his disadvantages. I also have heard some of the references that Eminem and both Machine Gun Kelly have made about white America. The relation of Machine Gun Kelly and Eminem show that they are similar, yet so different in so many ways.
ReplyDelete